Go to Page # Page of 19

Intellectual Property and Competition Policy in Japan

 Reiko Aoki
  17th-May-2017
Description: When restriction concerning the use of technologies results in excluding or controlling other firmsí business, this may be Private Monopolization (Article 2, Paragraph 5 of the AMA). Inhibiting the use of technology, limiting the scope of use of technology, imposing conditions for the use of technology, etc. When right holderís conduct is likely to impede fair competition, even if it does not match the requirements of Private Monopolization, the conduct may be Unfair Trade Practices (Article 2, Paragraph 9 of the AMA).
Views: 828
Domain: Business
Category: IP/Law
Contributing Organization: Bruegel
 ‐ More of their Presentations
Contents:
NO COMPETITION, NO GROWTH

Tuesday, 14 March,2017, : BRUEGEL
Intellectual Property and Competition Policy in Europe and Japan

Intellectual Property and
Competition Policy
in Japan
Japan Fair Trade Commission
Commissioner
Reiko AOKI
1

NO COMPETITION, NO GROWTH

Anti-Monopoly Act (AMA)
- 1947 (69years old)
- The 3rd competition law in the world
(after US and Canada)

- PURPOSE: “…..t ... See more

Recent Presentations

7 Cryptocurrency Exchange for you in 2018

A website that allows an individual to exchange cryptocurrencies buy or sell for other digital currency or conventional currency like Euro Or US dollars Is Called cryptocurrency ex

MLM vibes
20 April, 2018
...
20 April, 2018

Zero-Based Budgeting

The following is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any contract.

Josh Kamenecka
19 April, 2018