Wringing higher performance from CMOS transistors has become more difficult as scaling proceeds. So when TSMC first announced its 45-nm technology on April 9th, it wasn’t completely clear how the foundry would achieve its performance claims for its 45-nm high-performance technology.
Without introducing a high-k/metal gate solution, it claimed improvements which went beyond Intel’s claim of a 20 percent performance boost for its 45-nm process compared with the earlier generation.
Also, TSMC said the gate density of its 45 GS (General Superb, a new name for the high performance process) would be 2.35 times the gate density of the 65-nm GP transistor, instead of the normal density doubling.
The speed was said to be 1.39 times faster than the company’s 65-nm LP (low power) transistor, and the 0.9 V operating voltage was a marked improvement over the 1.1 V transistor at the 65-nm generation. That voltage improvement also was noteworthy, as high-performance processes from IBM and Intel will remain at 1 V operation at the 45-nm generation, despite strenuous efforts to go lower.
At the TSMC technology symposium in Austin Monday (April 16), TSMC managers explained that the high-performance 45 GS actually is based on 40-nm design rules. With risk production of the 45-nm LP starting in September 2007 and early production of the GS process beginning in May 2008, the company has time to shrink by about 10 percent and meet the tighter, 40-nm design rules, they said.  (It raises the question whey TSMC doesn’t call it the 40 GS instead of the 45 GS.)
While few hard metrics were offered in terms of drive current or power consumption (the company offers comparisons between its own transistors/test circuits at the 65- and 45-nm nodes), the SRAM cell size was quantified at 0.242 square microns for the 45 GS process. Going beyond the 2X density increase normally expected from one node to another was emphasized Monday as a major technology advantage by the TSMC managers, who exhorted customers to begin 45-nm designs now so they would be ready for the cost/performance crossover which they said is coming as soon as the second half of next year.
One of the first companies on board the TSMC 45-nm process train is Qualcomm, which expects to begin 45-nm production by the end of this year. With immersion lithography used for many levels of the 45-nm process, the biggest concern is additional defect densities from the interaction of water and photoresists. TSMC officials insist that defects from immersion are well under control, with “proprietary” defect control techniques developed in Hsinchu which not even ASML is privy to, they said.
Immersion will be used widely in the 45-nm process. The 45-nm, 32-Mbit SRAM which TSMC demonstrated on Dec. 5, 2006 used immersion for “12-18 layers,” a TSMC manager said.
With 0.9 V operation, a 2.35-times gate density increase, and claims of a 40 percent speed improvement and a 45 percent active power savings, TSMC is making big claims for its 45-nm GS process. It will be interesting to see if these claims hold up next year, and if yields suffer, or not, from immersion’s introduction to a foundry’s premier process.
 
 
Next

TSMC Technology Symposium: 45 GS process goes to 40-nm design rules

  3144      Nov 30, -0001
Wringing higher performance from CMOS transistors has become more difficult as scaling proceeds. So when TSMC first announced its 45-nm technology on April 9th, it wasn’t completely clear how the foundry would achieve its performance claims for its 45-nm high-performance technology.
Without introducing a high-k/metal gate solution, it claimed improvements which went beyond Intel’s claim of a 20 percent performance boost for its 45-nm process compared with the earlier generation.
Also, TSMC said the gate density of its 45 GS (General Superb, a new name for the high performance process) would be 2.35 times the gate density of the 65-nm GP transistor, instead of the normal density doubling.
The speed was said to be 1.39 times faster than the company’s 65-nm LP (low power) transistor, and the 0.9 V operating voltage was a marked improvement over the 1.1 V transistor at the 65-nm generation. That voltage improvement also was noteworthy, as high-performance processes from IBM and Intel will remain at 1 V operation at the 45-nm generation, despite strenuous efforts to go lower.
At the TSMC technology symposium in Austin Monday (April 16), TSMC managers explained that the high-performance 45 GS actually is based on 40-nm design rules. With risk production of the 45-nm LP starting in September 2007 and early production of the GS process beginning in May 2008, the company has time to shrink by about 10 percent and meet the tighter, 40-nm design rules, they said.  (It raises the question whey TSMC doesn’t call it the 40 GS instead of the 45 GS.)
While few hard metrics were offered in terms of drive current or power consumption (the company offers comparisons between its own transistors/test circuits at the 65- and 45-nm nodes), the SRAM cell size was quantified at 0.242 square microns for the 45 GS process. Going beyond the 2X density increase normally expected from one node to another was emphasized Monday as a major technology advantage by the TSMC managers, who exhorted customers to begin 45-nm designs now so they would be ready for the cost/performance crossover which they said is coming as soon as the second half of next year.
One of the first companies on board the TSMC 45-nm process train is Qualcomm, which expects to begin 45-nm production by the end of this year. With immersion lithography used for many levels of the 45-nm process, the biggest concern is additional defect densities from the interaction of water and photoresists. TSMC officials insist that defects from immersion are well under control, with “proprietary” defect control techniques developed in Hsinchu which not even ASML is privy to, they said.
Immersion will be used widely in the 45-nm process. The 45-nm, 32-Mbit SRAM which TSMC demonstrated on Dec. 5, 2006 used immersion for “12-18 layers,” a TSMC manager said.
With 0.9 V operation, a 2.35-times gate density increase, and claims of a 40 percent speed improvement and a 45 percent active power savings, TSMC is making big claims for its 45-nm GS process. It will be interesting to see if these claims hold up next year, and if yields suffer, or not, from immersion’s introduction to a foundry’s premier process.
 
 
About weVISION: weQuest's are written by G Dan Hutcheson, his career spans more than thirty years, in which he became a well-known as a visionary for helping companies make businesses out of technology. This includes hundreds of successful programs involving product development, positioning, and launch in Semiconductor, Technology, Medicine, Energy, Business, High Tech, Enviorntment, Electronics, healthcare and Business devisions.

You may like this also:

Andrea Lati
18 October, 2019
Mike Cowan
11 October, 2019
Andrea Lati
11 October, 2019
Andrea Lati
04 October, 2019
Risto Puhakka
02 October, 2019

Workstations and Distributed Computing

Virtual Desktop Infrastructure will be computing in the cloud. Multiple computers can be located on a single VDI, while PSE Infrastructure would require additional hardware.

David Meyer
01 October, 2019

Standardization on AI and Big in China

Functional & Performance Test for Big Data Products. It has become an industry-widely recognized authoritative test, Push big data platforms from project services.

Shirly ZHANG
30 September, 2019
Andrea Lati
27 September, 2019

Recent weVISIONs

Open IC Design Platforms ... with Michael Wishart of Efabless
Michael WishartEfabless
20 August, 2019
Tom Caulfield on what's next at GLOBALFOUNDRIES
Tom CaulfieldGLOBALFOUNDRIES
22 July, 2019